hpath/src/HPath.hs

471 lines
12 KiB
Haskell
Raw Normal View History

Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
-- |
-- Module : HPath
-- Copyright : © 20152016 FP Complete, 2016 Julian Ospald
-- License : BSD 3 clause
--
-- Maintainer : Julian Ospald <hasufell@posteo.de>
-- Stability : experimental
-- Portability : portable
--
-- Support for well-typed paths.
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
{-# LANGUAGE CPP #-}
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
{-# LANGUAGE DeriveDataTypeable #-}
{-# LANGUAGE EmptyDataDecls #-}
{-# LANGUAGE PatternSynonyms #-}
{-# OPTIONS_HADDOCK ignore-exports #-}
module HPath
(
-- * Types
Abs
,Path
,Rel
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
,Fn
,PathParseException
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
-- * PatternSynonyms/ViewPatterns
,pattern Path
-- * Path Parsing
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
,parseAbs
,parseFn
,parseRel
-- * Path Conversion
,canonicalizePath
,fromAbs
,fromRel
,normalize
,toFilePath
-- * Path Operations
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
,(</>)
,basename
,dirname
,isParentOf
2016-04-03 14:20:38 +00:00
,getAllParents
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
,stripDir
-- * ByteString/Word8 constants
,nullByte
,pathDot
,pathDot'
,pathSeparator'
-- * ByteString operations
,fpToString
,userStringToFP
2016-04-10 19:50:52 +00:00
-- * ByteString Query functions
,hiddenFile
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
-- * Queries
,hasParentDir
,isFileName
-- * String based functions
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
)
where
import Control.Exception (Exception)
import Control.Monad.Catch (MonadThrow(..))
import Data.ByteString(ByteString)
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
import qualified Data.ByteString as BS
import Data.ByteString.UTF8 (fromString, toString)
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
import Data.Data
import qualified Data.List as L
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
import Data.Maybe
2016-04-04 16:46:25 +00:00
import Data.Word8
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
import HPath.Internal
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
import System.Posix.FilePath hiding ((</>))
import System.Posix.Directory.Traversals(realpath)
2016-04-04 22:54:36 +00:00
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Types
-- | An absolute path.
data Abs deriving (Typeable)
-- | A relative path; one without a root.
data Rel deriving (Typeable)
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
-- | A filename, without any '/'.
data Fn deriving (Typeable)
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
-- | Exception when parsing a location.
data PathParseException
= InvalidAbs ByteString
| InvalidRel ByteString
| InvalidFn ByteString
| Couldn'tStripPrefixTPS ByteString ByteString
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
deriving (Show,Typeable)
instance Exception PathParseException
data PathException = RootDirHasNoBasename
deriving (Show,Typeable)
instance Exception PathException
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
instance RelC Rel
instance RelC Fn
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- PatternSynonyms
pattern Path x <- (MkPath x)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Path Parsers
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
-- | Get a location for an absolute path. Produces a normalised path.
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
--
-- Throws: 'PathParseException'
--
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
-- >>> parseAbs "/abc" :: Maybe (Path Abs)
-- Just "/abc"
-- >>> parseAbs "/" :: Maybe (Path Abs)
-- Just "/"
-- >>> parseAbs "/abc/def" :: Maybe (Path Abs)
-- Just "/abc/def"
-- >>> parseAbs "/abc/def/.///" :: Maybe (Path Abs)
-- Just "/abc/def/"
-- >>> parseAbs "abc" :: Maybe (Path Abs)
-- Nothing
-- >>> parseAbs "" :: Maybe (Path Abs)
-- Nothing
-- >>> parseAbs "/abc/../foo" :: Maybe (Path Abs)
-- Nothing
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
parseAbs :: MonadThrow m
=> ByteString -> m (Path Abs)
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
parseAbs filepath =
if isAbsolute filepath &&
isValid filepath &&
not (hasParentDir filepath)
then return (MkPath $ normalise filepath)
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
else throwM (InvalidAbs filepath)
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
-- | Get a location for a relative path. Produces a normalised
-- path.
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
--
-- Note that @filepath@ may contain any number of @./@ but may not consist
-- solely of @./@. It also may not contain a single @..@ anywhere.
--
-- Throws: 'PathParseException'
--
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
-- >>> parseRel "abc" :: Maybe (Path Rel)
-- Just "abc"
-- >>> parseRel "def/" :: Maybe (Path Rel)
-- Just "def/"
-- >>> parseRel "abc/def" :: Maybe (Path Rel)
-- Just "abc/def"
-- >>> parseRel "abc/def/." :: Maybe (Path Rel)
-- Just "abc/def/"
-- >>> parseRel "/abc" :: Maybe (Path Rel)
-- Nothing
-- >>> parseRel "" :: Maybe (Path Rel)
-- Nothing
-- >>> parseRel "abc/../foo" :: Maybe (Path Rel)
-- Nothing
-- >>> parseRel "." :: Maybe (Path Rel)
-- Nothing
-- >>> parseRel ".." :: Maybe (Path Rel)
-- Nothing
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
parseRel :: MonadThrow m
=> ByteString -> m (Path Rel)
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
parseRel filepath =
if not (isAbsolute filepath) &&
filepath /= pathDot' && filepath /= pathDoubleDot &&
not (hasParentDir filepath) &&
isValid filepath
then return (MkPath $ normalise filepath)
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
else throwM (InvalidRel filepath)
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
-- | Parses a filename. Filenames must not contain slashes.
-- Excludes '.' and '..'.
--
-- Throws: 'PathParseException'
--
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
-- >>> parseFn "abc" :: Maybe (Path Fn)
-- Just "abc"
-- >>> parseFn "..." :: Maybe (Path Fn)
-- Just "..."
-- >>> parseFn "def/" :: Maybe (Path Fn)
-- Nothing
-- >>> parseFn "abc/def" :: Maybe (Path Fn)
-- Nothing
-- >>> parseFn "abc/def/." :: Maybe (Path Fn)
-- Nothing
-- >>> parseFn "/abc" :: Maybe (Path Fn)
-- Nothing
-- >>> parseFn "" :: Maybe (Path Fn)
-- Nothing
-- >>> parseFn "abc/../foo" :: Maybe (Path Fn)
-- Nothing
-- >>> parseFn "." :: Maybe (Path Fn)
-- Nothing
-- >>> parseFn ".." :: Maybe (Path Fn)
-- Nothing
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
parseFn :: MonadThrow m
=> ByteString -> m (Path Fn)
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
parseFn filepath =
if isFileName filepath &&
filepath /= pathDot' && filepath /= pathDoubleDot &&
isValid filepath
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
then return (MkPath filepath)
else throwM (InvalidFn filepath)
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
2016-04-04 22:54:36 +00:00
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Path Conversion
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
-- | Convert to a ByteString type.
toFilePath :: Path b -> ByteString
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
toFilePath (MkPath l) = l
fromAbs :: Path Abs -> ByteString
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
fromAbs = toFilePath
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
fromRel :: RelC r => Path r -> ByteString
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
fromRel = toFilePath
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
normalize :: Path t -> Path t
normalize (MkPath l) = MkPath $ normalise l
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
-- | May fail on `realpath`.
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
canonicalizePath :: Path Abs -> IO (Path Abs)
canonicalizePath (MkPath l) = do
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
nl <- realpath l
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
return $ MkPath nl
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Path Operations
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
-- | Append two paths.
--
-- The second argument must always be a relative path, which ensures
-- that undefinable things like `"/abc" </> "/def"` cannot happen.
--
-- Technically, the first argument can be a path that points to a non-directory,
-- because this library is IO-agnostic and makes no assumptions about
-- file types.
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
--
-- >>> (MkPath "/") </> (MkPath "file" :: Path Rel)
-- "/file"
-- >>> (MkPath "/path/to") </> (MkPath "file" :: Path Rel)
-- "/path/to/file"
-- >>> (MkPath "/") </> (MkPath "file/lal" :: Path Rel)
-- "/file/lal"
-- >>> (MkPath "/") </> (MkPath "file/" :: Path Rel)
-- "/file/"
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
(</>) :: RelC r => Path b -> Path r -> Path b
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
(</>) (MkPath a) (MkPath b) = MkPath (a' `BS.append` b)
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
where
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
a' = if BS.last a == pathSeparator
then a
else addTrailingPathSeparator a
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
-- | Strip directory from path, making it relative to that directory.
-- Throws 'Couldn'tStripPrefixDir' if directory is not a parent of the path.
--
-- The bases must match.
--
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
-- >>> (MkPath "/lal/lad") `stripDir` (MkPath "/lal/lad/fad") :: Maybe (Path Rel)
-- Just "fad"
-- >>> (MkPath "lal/lad") `stripDir` (MkPath "lal/lad/fad") :: Maybe (Path Rel)
-- Just "fad"
-- >>> (MkPath "/") `stripDir` (MkPath "/") :: Maybe (Path Rel)
-- Nothing
-- >>> (MkPath "/lal/lad/fad") `stripDir` (MkPath "/lal/lad") :: Maybe (Path Rel)
-- Nothing
-- >>> (MkPath "fad") `stripDir` (MkPath "fad") :: Maybe (Path Rel)
-- Nothing
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
stripDir :: MonadThrow m
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
=> Path b -> Path b -> m (Path Rel)
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
stripDir (MkPath p) (MkPath l) =
case stripPrefix p' l of
Nothing -> throwM (Couldn'tStripPrefixTPS p' l)
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
Just ok -> if BS.null ok
then throwM (Couldn'tStripPrefixTPS p' l)
else return (MkPath ok)
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
where
p' = addTrailingPathSeparator p
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
-- | Is p a parent of the given location? Implemented in terms of
-- 'stripDir'. The bases must match.
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
--
-- >>> (MkPath "/lal/lad") `isParentOf` (MkPath "/lal/lad/fad")
-- True
-- >>> (MkPath "lal/lad") `isParentOf` (MkPath "lal/lad/fad")
-- True
-- >>> (MkPath "/") `isParentOf` (MkPath "/")
-- False
-- >>> (MkPath "/lal/lad/fad") `isParentOf` (MkPath "/lal/lad")
-- False
-- >>> (MkPath "fad") `isParentOf` (MkPath "fad")
-- False
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
isParentOf :: Path b -> Path b -> Bool
isParentOf p l = isJust (stripDir p l :: Maybe (Path Rel))
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
2016-04-03 14:20:38 +00:00
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
-- |Get all parents of a path.
--
-- >>> getAllParents (MkPath "/abs/def/dod")
-- ["/abs/def","/abs","/"]
-- >>> getAllParents (MkPath "/")
-- []
2016-04-03 14:20:38 +00:00
getAllParents :: Path Abs -> [Path Abs]
getAllParents (MkPath p)
| np == pathSeparator' = []
| otherwise = dirname (MkPath np) : getAllParents (dirname $ MkPath np)
2016-04-03 14:20:38 +00:00
where
np = dropTrailingPathSeparator . normalise $ p
2016-04-03 14:20:38 +00:00
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
-- | Extract the directory name of a path.
--
-- The following properties hold:
--
-- @dirname (p \<\/> a) == dirname p@
--
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
-- >>> dirname (MkPath "/abc/def/dod")
-- "/abc/def"
-- >>> dirname (MkPath "/")
-- "/"
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
dirname :: Path Abs -> Path Abs
dirname (MkPath fp) = MkPath (takeDirectory $ dropTrailingPathSeparator fp)
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
-- | Extract the file part of a path.
--
--
-- The following properties hold:
--
-- @basename (p \<\/> a) == basename a@
--
-- Throws: `PathException` if given the root path "/"
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
--
-- >>> basename (MkPath "/abc/def/dod") :: Maybe (Path Fn)
-- Just "dod"
-- >>> basename (MkPath "/") :: Maybe (Path Fn)
-- Nothing
basename :: MonadThrow m => Path b -> m (Path Fn)
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
basename (MkPath l)
| not (isAbsolute rl) = return $ MkPath rl
| otherwise = throwM RootDirHasNoBasename
Fork chrisdone's path library I wasn't happy with the way it dealt with Dir vs File things. In his version of the library, a `Path b Dir` always ends with a trailing path separator and `Path b File` never ends with a trailing path separator. IMO, it is nonsensical to make a Dir vs File distinction on path level, although it first seems nice. Some of the reasons are: * a path is just that: a path. It is completely disconnected from IO level and even if a `Dir`/`File` type theoretically allows us to say "this path ought to point to a file", there is literally zero guarantee that it will hold true at runtime. So this basically gives a false feeling of a type-safe file distinction. * it's imprecise about Dir vs File distinction, which makes it even worse, because a directory is also a file (just not a regular file). Add symlinks to that and the confusion is complete. * it makes the API oddly complicated for use cases where we basically don't care (yet) whether something turns out to be a directory or not Still, it comes also with a few perks: * it simplifies some functions, because they now have guarantees whether a path ends in a trailing path separator or not * it may be safer for interaction with other library functions, which behave differently depending on a trailing path separator (like probably shelly) Not limited to, but also in order to fix my remarks without breaking any benefits, I did: * rename the `Dir`/`File` types to `TPS`/`NoTPS`, so it's clear we are only giving information about trailing path separators and not actual file types we don't know about yet * add a `MaybeTPS` type, which does not mess with trailing path separators and also gives no guarantees about them... then added `toNoTPS` and `toTPS` to allow type-safe conversion * make some functions accept more general types, so we don't unnecessarily force paths with trailing separators for `(</>)` for example... instead these functions now examine the paths to still have correct behavior. This is really minor overhead. You might say now "but then I can append filepath to filepath". Well, as I said... we don't know whether it's a "filepath" at all. * merge `filename` and `dirname` into `basename` and make `parent` be `dirname`, so the function names match the name of the POSIX ones, which do (almost) the same... * fix a bug in `basename` (formerly `dirname`) which broke the type guarantees * add a pattern synonym for easier pattern matching without exporting the internal Path constructor
2016-03-08 21:53:42 +00:00
where
rl = last . splitPath . dropTrailingPathSeparator $ l
2016-04-10 19:50:52 +00:00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- ByteString Query functions
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
-- | Whether the file is a hidden file.
--
-- >>> hiddenFile (MkPath ".foo")
-- True
-- >>> hiddenFile (MkPath "..foo.bar")
-- True
-- >>> hiddenFile (MkPath "...")
-- True
-- >>> hiddenFile (MkPath "dod")
-- False
-- >>> hiddenFile (MkPath "dod.bar")
-- False
2016-04-10 19:50:52 +00:00
hiddenFile :: Path Fn -> Bool
hiddenFile (MkPath fp)
| fp == pathDoubleDot = False
| fp == pathDot' = False
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
| otherwise = pathDot' `BS.isPrefixOf` fp
2016-04-10 19:50:52 +00:00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- ByteString/Word8 constants
pathSeparator' :: ByteString
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
pathSeparator' = BS.singleton pathSeparator
pathDot :: Word8
2016-04-04 16:46:25 +00:00
pathDot = _period
pathDot' :: ByteString
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
pathDot' = BS.singleton pathDot
pathDoubleDot :: ByteString
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
pathDoubleDot = pathDot `BS.cons` pathDot'
nullByte :: Word8
2016-04-04 16:46:25 +00:00
nullByte = _nul
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- ByteString Operations
-- |Uses UTF-8 decoding to convert the bytestring into a String.
fpToString :: ByteString -> String
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
fpToString = toString
-- |Uses UTF-8 encoding to convert a user provided String into
-- a ByteString, which represents a filepath.
userStringToFP :: String -> ByteString
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
userStringToFP = fromString
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
#if MIN_VERSION_bytestring(0,10,8)
#else
stripPrefix :: ByteString -> ByteString -> Maybe ByteString
stripPrefix a b = BS.pack `fmap` L.stripPrefix (BS.unpack a) (BS.unpack b)
#endif
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- ByteString Query functions
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
-- | Helper function: check if the filepath has any parent directories in it.
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
--
-- >>> hasParentDir "/.."
-- True
-- >>> hasParentDir "foo/bar/.."
-- True
-- >>> hasParentDir "foo/../bar/."
-- True
-- >>> hasParentDir "foo/bar"
-- False
-- >>> hasParentDir "foo"
-- False
-- >>> hasParentDir ""
-- False
-- >>> hasParentDir ".."
-- False
hasParentDir :: ByteString -> Bool
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
hasParentDir filepath =
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
((pathSeparator `BS.cons` pathDoubleDot) `BS.isSuffixOf` filepath) ||
((pathSeparator' `BS.append` pathDoubleDot `BS.append` pathSeparator')
`BS.isInfixOf` filepath) ||
((pathDoubleDot `BS.append` pathSeparator') `BS.isPrefixOf` filepath)
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
-- | Is the given filename a valid filename?
--
-- >>> isFileName "lal"
-- True
-- >>> isFileName "."
-- True
-- >>> isFileName ".."
-- True
-- >>> isFileName ""
-- False
-- >>> isFileName "\0"
-- False
-- >>> isFileName "/random_ path:*"
-- False
isFileName :: ByteString -> Bool
2016-03-30 00:47:42 +00:00
isFileName filepath =
2016-04-16 16:17:44 +00:00
not (pathSeparator' `BS.isInfixOf` filepath) &&
not (BS.null filepath) &&
not (nullByte `BS.elem` filepath)
2016-04-04 22:54:55 +00:00