neovim-gtk: version bump to 0.2.0 #43
No hay revisores
Etiquetas
Sin etiquetas
bug
bump
improvement
move
Sin Milestone
No asignados
2 participantes
Notificaciones
Fecha de vencimiento
Sin fecha de vencimiento.
Dependencias
No se han establecido dependencias.
Referencia: hasufell/hasufell-repository#43
Cargando…
Referencia en una nueva incidencia
No se ha proporcionado una descripción.
Eliminar rama "kapsh/hasufell-repository:nvim "
Eliminar una rama es permanente. Aunque la rama eliminada puede continuar existiendo durante un corto tiempo antes de que sea eliminada, en la mayoría de los casos NO PUEDE deshacerse. ¿Continuar?
Present version fails to build (somewhere around glib crate) and it's too old to figure out why. Updated instead.
Tagged version unusable with current pango (redraw issues, missing command line, etc) without backported patch, although other related fixes (e.g. shifting colored characters) from https://github.com/daa84/neovim-gtk/issues/208 couldn't apply cleanly on ths commit.
@hasufell waiting for approval or merging in, say, two weeks in case you don't care .
@ -21,4 +23,3 @@
cargo_src_unpack
}
src_install() {
Moved into exlib, build+install tested for both versions.
@ -16,2 +16,4 @@
x11-libs/gtk+:3[>=3.22.0]
x11-libs/pango[>=1.38]
run:
gnome-desktop/gsettings-desktop-schemas
(NeovimGtk:23745): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: 01:45:31.695: Settings schema 'org.gnome.desktop.interface' is not installed
@ -15,4 +16,1 @@
src_prepare() {
default
export PREFIX=/usr
Guess it's fine without PREFIX set:
@ -11,11 +11,25 @@ HOMEPAGE="https://github.com/daa84/neovim-gtk ${HOMEPAGE}"
LICENCES="GPL-3.0"
MYOPTIONS=""
BUGS_TO="hasufell@posteo.de"
Removed from recommended metadata in
8886e87da9
I'm generally not a fan of exlibs in this context (exheres should be as static as possible... code sharing is actually a problem), but doesn't matter much.
@ -19,0 +23,4 @@
for s in 48 128; do
insinto /usr/share/icons/hicolor/${s}x${s}/apps
newins desktop/org.daa.NeovimGtk_${s}.png org.daa.NeovimGtk.png
done
I'm pedantic, but
unset s
, although it's not needed here... I consider it good practice in bash.As usual, I forgot to
local
it. Fixed.Well, currently they can use similar install procedure (based on makefile revisions in tagged and master). My point here is: if that becomes problem for future versions, relevant parts can be offloaded again.