.github | ||
.gitlab | ||
.travis | ||
app | ||
data | ||
docker | ||
docs | ||
lib | ||
scoop-better-shimexe | ||
scripts | ||
test | ||
www | ||
.gitignore | ||
.gitlab-ci.yml | ||
.hlint.yaml | ||
.travis.yml | ||
cabal.ghc901.project | ||
cabal.ghc901.project.freeze | ||
cabal.ghc8107.project | ||
cabal.ghc8107.project.freeze | ||
cabal.project | ||
cabal.project.freeze | ||
ghcup.cabal | ||
hie.yaml | ||
LICENSE | ||
README.md | ||
Setup.hs | ||
stack.yaml |
ghcup
makes it easy to install specific versions of ghc
on GNU/Linux,
macOS (aka Darwin), FreeBSD and Windows and can also bootstrap a fresh Haskell developer environment from scratch.
It follows the unix UNIX philosophy of do one thing and do it well.
Similar in scope to rustup, pyenv and jenv.
Table of Contents
Installation
Simple bootstrap
Follow the instructions at https://www.haskell.org/ghcup/
Manual install
Download the binary for your platform at https://downloads.haskell.org/~ghcup/
and place it into your PATH
anywhere.
Then adjust your PATH
in ~/.bashrc
(or similar, depending on your shell) like so:
export PATH="$HOME/.cabal/bin:$HOME/.ghcup/bin:$PATH"
Vim integration
See ghcup.vim.
Usage
See ghcup --help
.
For the simple interactive TUI, run:
ghcup tui
For the full functionality via cli:
# list available ghc/cabal versions
ghcup list
# install the recommended GHC version
ghcup install ghc
# install a specific GHC version
ghcup install ghc 8.2.2
# set the currently "active" GHC version
ghcup set ghc 8.4.4
# install cabal-install
ghcup install cabal
# update ghcup itself
ghcup upgrade
GHCup works very well with cabal-install
, which
handles your haskell packages and can demand that a specific version of ghc
is available, which ghcup
can do.
Configuration
A configuration file can be put in ~/.ghcup/config.yaml
. The default config file
explaining all possible configurations can be found in this repo: config.yaml.
Partial configuration is fine. Command line options always override the config file settings.
Manpages
For man pages to work you need man-db as your man
provider, then issue man ghc
. Manpages only work for the currently set ghc.
MANPATH
may be required to be unset.
Shell-completion
Shell completions are in scripts/shell-completions directory of this repository.
For bash: install shell-completions/bash
as e.g. /etc/bash_completion.d/ghcup
(depending on distro)
and make sure your bashrc sources the startup script
(/usr/share/bash-completion/bash_completion
on some distros).
Compiling GHC from source
Compiling from source is supported for both source tarballs and arbitrary git refs. See ghcup compile ghc --help
for a list of all available options.
If you need to overwrite the existing build.mk
, check the default files
in data/build_mk, copy them somewhere, adjust them and
pass --config path/to/build.mk
to ghcup compile ghc
.
Common build.mk
options are explained here.
Make sure your system meets all the prerequisites.
Cross support
ghcup can compile and install a cross GHC for any target. However, this requires that the build host has a complete cross toolchain and various libraries installed for the target platform.
Consult the GHC documentation on the prerequisites.
For distributions with non-standard locations of cross toolchain and
libraries, this may need some tweaking of build.mk
or configure args.
See ghcup compile ghc --help
for further information.
XDG support
To enable XDG style directories, set the environment variable GHCUP_USE_XDG_DIRS
to anything.
Then you can control the locations via XDG environment variables as such:
XDG_DATA_HOME
: GHCs will be unpacked inghcup/ghc
subdir (default:~/.local/share
)XDG_CACHE_HOME
: logs and download files will be stored inghcup
subdir (default:~/.cache
)XDG_BIN_HOME
: binaries end up here (default:~/.local/bin
)XDG_CONFIG_HOME
: the config file is stored inghcup
subdir asconfig.yaml
(default:~/.config
)
Note that ghcup
makes some assumptions about structure of files in XDG_BIN_HOME
. So if you have other tools
installing e.g. stack/cabal/ghc into it, this will likely clash. In that case consider disabling XDG support.
Env variables
This is the complete list of env variables that change GHCup behavior:
GHCUP_USE_XDG_DIRS
: see XDG support aboveTMPDIR
: where ghcup does the work (unpacking, building, ...)GHCUP_INSTALL_BASE_PREFIX
: the base of ghcup (default:$HOME
)GHCUP_CURL_OPTS
: additional options that can be passed to curlGHCUP_WGET_OPTS
: additional options that can be passed to wgetGHCUP_SKIP_UPDATE_CHECK
: Skip the (possibly annoying) update check when you run a commandCC
/LD
etc.: full environment is passed to the build system when compiling GHC via GHCup
Installing custom bindists
There are a couple of good use cases to install custom bindists:
- manually built bindists (e.g. with patches)
- example:
ghcup install ghc -u 'file:///home/mearwald/tmp/ghc-eff-patches/ghc-8.10.2-x86_64-deb10-linux.tar.xz' 8.10.2-eff
- GHC head CI bindists
- example:
ghcup install ghc -u 'https://gitlab.haskell.org/api/v4/projects/1/jobs/artifacts/master/raw/ghc-x86_64-fedora27-linux.tar.xz?job=validate-x86_64-linux-fedora27' head
- DWARF bindists
- example:
ghcup install ghc -u 'https://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/8.10.2/ghc-8.10.2-x86_64-deb10-linux-dwarf.tar.xz' 8.10.2-dwarf
Since the version parser is pretty lax, 8.10.2-eff
and head
are both valid versions
and produce the binaries ghc-8.10.2-eff
and ghc-head
respectively.
GHCup always needs to know which version the bindist corresponds to (this is not automatically
detected).
Isolated installs
Ghcup also enables you to install a tool (GHC, Cabal, HLS, Stack) at an isolated location of your choosing. These installs, as the name suggests, are separate from your main installs and DO NOT conflict with them.
-
No symlinks are made to these isolated installed tools, you'd have to manually point to them wherever you intend to use them.
-
These installs, can also NOT be deleted from ghcup, you'd have to go and manually delete these.
You need to use the --isolate
or -i
flag followed by the directory path.
Examples:-
-
install an isolated GHC version at location /home/user/isolated_dir/ghc/
ghcup install ghc 8.10.5 --isolate /home/user/isolated_dir/ghc
-
isolated install Cabal at a location you desire
ghcup install cabal --isolate /home/username/my_isolated_dir/
-
do an isolated install with a custom bindist
ghcup install ghc --isolate /home/username/my_isolated_dir/ -u 'https://gitlab.haskell.org/api/v4/projects/1/jobs/artifacts/master/raw/ghc-x86_64-fedora27-linux.tar.xz?job=validate-x86_64-linux-fedora27' head
-
isolated install HLS
ghcup install hls --isolate /home/username/dir/hls/
-
you can even compile ghc to an isolated location.
ghcup compile ghc -j 4 -v 9.0.1 -b 8.10.5 -i /home/username/my/dir/ghc
CI
On windows, ghcup can be installed automatically on a CI runner like so:
Set-ExecutionPolicy Bypass -Scope Process -Force;[System.Net.ServicePointManager]::SecurityProtocol = [System.Net.ServicePointManager]::SecurityProtocol -bor 3072;Invoke-Command -ScriptBlock ([ScriptBlock]::Create((Invoke-WebRequest https://www.haskell.org/ghcup/sh/bootstrap-haskell.ps1 -UseBasicParsing))) -ArgumentList $false,$true,$true,$false,$false,$false,$false,"C:\"
On linux/darwin/freebsd, run the following on your runner:
curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSf https://get-ghcup.haskell.org | BOOTSTRAP_HASKELL_NONINTERACTIVE=1 BOOTSTRAP_HASKELL_MINIMAL=1 sh
This will just install ghcup
and on windows additionally msys2
.
Example github workflow
On github workflows you can use https://github.com/haskell/actions/
If you want to install ghcup manually though, here's an example config:
name: Haskell CI
on:
push:
branches: [ master ]
pull_request:
branches: [ master ]
jobs:
build-cabal:
runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }}
strategy:
fail-fast: false
matrix:
os: [ubuntu-latest, macOS-latest, windows-latest]
ghc: ['8.10.7', '9.0.1']
cabal: ['3.4.0.0']
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v2
- if: matrix.os == 'windows-latest'
name: Install ghcup on windows
run: Set-ExecutionPolicy Bypass -Scope Process -Force;[System.Net.ServicePointManager]::SecurityProtocol = [System.Net.ServicePointManager]::SecurityProtocol -bor 3072;Invoke-Command -ScriptBlock ([ScriptBlock]::Create((Invoke-WebRequest https://www.haskell.org/ghcup/sh/bootstrap-haskell.ps1 -UseBasicParsing))) -ArgumentList $false,$true,$true,$false,$false,$false,$false,"C:\"
- if: matrix.os == 'windows-latest'
name: Add ghcup to PATH
run: echo "/c/ghcup/bin" >> $GITHUB_PATH
shell: bash
- if: matrix.os != 'windows-latest'
name: Install ghcup on non-windows
run: curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSf https://get-ghcup.haskell.org | BOOTSTRAP_HASKELL_NONINTERACTIVE=1 BOOTSTRAP_HASKELL_MINIMAL=1 sh
- name: Install ghc/cabal
run: |
ghcup install ghc ${{ matrix.ghc }}
ghcup install cabal ${{ matrix.cabal }}
shell: bash
- name: Update cabal index
run: cabal update
shell: bash
- name: Build
run: cabal build --enable-tests --enable-benchmarks
shell: bash
- name: Run tests
run: cabal test
shell: bash
Tips and tricks
with_ghc wrapper (e.g. for HLS)
Due to some HLS bugs it's necessary that the ghc
in PATH
is the one defined in cabal.project
. With some simple shell functions, we can start our editor with the appropriate
path prepended.
For bash, in e.g. ~/.bashrc
define:
with_ghc() {
local np=$(ghcup --offline whereis -d ghc $1 || { ghcup --cache install ghc $1 && ghcup whereis -d ghc $1 ;})
if [ -e "${np}" ] ; then
shift
PATH="$np:$PATH" "$@"
else
>&2 echo "Cannot find or install GHC version $1"
return 1
fi
}
For fish shell, in e.g. ~/.config/fish/config.fish
define:
function with_ghc
set --local np (ghcup --offline whereis -d ghc $argv[1] ; or begin ghcup --cache install ghc $argv[1] ; and ghcup whereis -d ghc $argv[1] ; end)
if test -e "$np"
PATH="$np:$PATH" $argv[2..-1]
else
echo "Cannot find or install GHC version $argv[1]" 1>&2
return 1
end
end
Then start a new shell and issue:
# replace 'code' with your editor
with_ghc 8.10.5 code path/to/haskell/source
Cabal and HLS will now see 8.10.5
as the primary GHC, without the need to
run ghcup set
all the time when switching between projects.
Design goals
- simplicity
- non-interactive
- portable (eh)
- do one thing and do it well (UNIX philosophy)
Non-goals
- invoking
sudo
,apt-get
or any package manager - handling system packages
- handling cabal projects
- being a stack alternative
How
Installs a specified GHC version into ~/.ghcup/ghc/<ver>
, and places ghc-<ver>
symlinks in ~/.ghcup/bin/
.
Optionally, an unversioned ghc
link can point to a default version of your choice.
This uses precompiled GHC binaries that have been compiled on fedora/debian by upstream GHC.
Alternatively, you can also tell it to compile from source (note that this might fail due to missing requirements).
In addition this script can also install cabal-install
.
Known users
- Github actions:
- mirrors:
- tools:
Known problems
Custom ghc version names
When installing ghc bindists with custom version names as outlined in
installing custom bindists, then cabal might
be unable to find the correct ghc-pkg
(also see #73)
if you use cabal build --with-compiler=ghc-foo
. Instead, point it to the full path, such as:
cabal build --with-compiler=$HOME/.ghcup/ghc/<version-name>/bin/ghc
or set that GHC version
as the current one via: ghcup set ghc <version-name>
.
This problem doesn't exist for regularly installed GHC versions.
Limited distributions supported
Currently only GNU/Linux distributions compatible with the upstream GHC binaries are supported.
Precompiled binaries
Since this uses precompiled binaries you may run into several problems.
Missing libtinfo (ncurses)
You may run into problems with ncurses and missing libtinfo, in case your distribution doesn't use the legacy way of building ncurses and has no compatibility symlinks in place.
Ask your distributor on how to solve this or
try to compile from source via ghcup compile <version>
.
Libnuma required
This was a bug in the build system of some GHC versions that lead to unconditionally enabled libnuma support. To mitigate this you might have to install the libnuma package of your distribution. See here for a discussion.
Compilation
Although this script can compile GHC for you, it's just a very thin wrapper around the build system. It makes no effort in trying to figure out whether you have the correct toolchain and the correct dependencies. Refer to the official docs on how to prepare your environment for building GHC.
Stack support
There may be a number of bugs when trying to make ghcup installed GHC versions work with stack, such as:
Further, stack's upgrade procedure may break/confuse ghcup. There are a number of integration issues discussed here:
Windows support
Windows support is in early stages. Since windows doesn't support symbolic links properly, ghcup uses a shimgen wrapper. It seems to work well, but there may be unknown issues with that approach.
Windows 7 and Powershell 2.0 aren't well supported at the moment, also see:
- https://gitlab.haskell.org/haskell/ghcup-hs/-/issues/140
- https://gitlab.haskell.org/haskell/ghcup-hs/-/issues/197
FAQ
Why reimplement stack?
GHCup is not a reimplementation of stack. The only common part is automatic installation of GHC, but even that differs in scope and design.
Why should I use ghcup over stack?
GHCup is not a replacement for stack. Instead, it supports installing and managing stack versions. It does the same for cabal, GHC and HLS. As such, It doesn't make a workflow choice for you.
Why should I let ghcup manage stack?
You don't need to. However, some users seem to prefer to have a central tool that manages cabal and stack at the same time. Additionally, it can allow better sharing of GHC installation across these tools. Also see:
- https://docs.haskellstack.org/en/stable/yaml_configuration/#system-ghc
- https://github.com/commercialhaskell/stack/pull/5585
Why does ghcup not use stack code?
Oddly, this question has been asked a couple of times. For the curious, here are a few reasons:
- GHCup started as a shell script. At the time of rewriting it in Haskell, the authors didn't even know that stack exposes some of its installation API
- Even if they did, it doesn't seem it would have satisfied their needs
- it didn't support cabal installation, which was the main motivation behind GHCup back then
- depending on a codebase as big as stack for a central part of one's application without having a short contribution pipeline would likely have caused stagnation or resulted in simply copy-pasting the relevant code in order to adjust it
- it's not clear how GHCup would have been implemented with the provided API. It seems the codebases are fairly different. GHCup does a lot of symlink handling to expose a central
bin/
directory that users can easily put in PATH, without having to worry about anything more. It also provides explicit removal functionality, GHC cross-compilation, a TUI, etc etc.
- GHCup is built around unix principles and supposed to be simple.
Why not unify...
...stack and Cabal and do away with standalone installers
GHCup is not involved in such decisions. cabal-install and stack might have a sufficiently different user experience to warrant having a choice.
...installer implementations and have a common library
This sounds like an interesting goal. However, GHC installation isn't a hard engineering problem and the shared code wouldn't be too exciting. For such an effort to make sense, all involved parties would need to collaborate and have a short pipeline to get patches in.
It's true this would solve the integration problem, but following unix principles, we can do similar via hooks. Both cabal and stack can support installation hooks. These hooks can then call into ghcup or anything else, also see:
...installers (like, all of it)
So far, there hasn't been an open discussion about this. Is this even a good idea? Sometimes projects converge eventually if their overlap is big enough, sometimes they don't.
While unification sounds like a simplification of the ecosystem, it also takes away choice.
Take curl
and wget
as an example.
How bad do we need this?
Why not support windows?
Windows is supported since GHCup version 0.1.15.1.
Why the haskell reimplementation?
GHCup started as a portable posix shell script of maybe 50 LOC. GHC installation itself can be carried out in about ~3 lines of shell code (download, unpack , configure+make install). However, much convenient functionality has been added since, as well as ensuring that all operations are safe and correct. The shell script ended up with over 2k LOC, which was very hard to maintain.
The main concern when switching from a portable shell script to haskell was platform/architecture support. However, ghcup now re-uses GHCs CI infrastructure and as such is perfectly in sync with all platforms that GHC supports.
Is GHCup affiliated with the Haskell Foundation?
There has been some collaboration: Windows and Stack support were mainly requested by the Haskell Foundation and those seemed interesting features to add.
Other than that, GHCup is dedicated only to its users and is supported by haskell.org through hosting and CI infrastructure.