Merge pull request #82 from cpfaff/doc_improvement
improves unite source and faq descriptions
This commit is contained in:
commit
1c3672ea97
@ -541,13 +541,14 @@ E484, Vim(cmdname):{errmsg}"
|
||||
|
||||
If you create a snippet file and prepend the filename with a "_" neosnippet
|
||||
treats the snippets inside the file as global. This means that they will be
|
||||
available for all file types (e.g _.snip). You can include snippet files with
|
||||
available for all file types (e.g _.snip). You can include other snippet files
|
||||
from within a snippet file with.
|
||||
|
||||
>
|
||||
include c.snip
|
||||
<
|
||||
|
||||
or if you want to include a whole directory with file type snippets.
|
||||
Or if you want to include a whole directory with file type snippets.
|
||||
|
||||
>
|
||||
include javascript/*
|
||||
@ -564,7 +565,6 @@ detects this. If you want to overwrite a snippet explicitly, please use:
|
||||
After that you can redefine the snippet. But this does not work if you include
|
||||
external snippet files. There will be no warning when snippets get overwritten.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Multi snippet feature in snipMate is available.
|
||||
Neosnippet substitutes trigger and descriptions spaces to '_'.
|
||||
>
|
||||
@ -589,12 +589,14 @@ UNITE SOURCES *neosnippet-unite-sources*
|
||||
|
||||
*neosnippet-unite-source-snippet*
|
||||
snippet
|
||||
The candidates are neosnippet snippets. The kinds are
|
||||
"snippet". Normally used in
|
||||
|<Plug>(neosnippet_start_unite_snippet)| mappings.
|
||||
But you can execute it by ":Unite snippet".
|
||||
You can edit snippet file in "edit" action.
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
The candidates of the snippet source are neosnippet snippets.
|
||||
and their kind is "snippet". You can use the snippet source
|
||||
with the mapping |<Plug>(neosnippet_start_unite_snippet)|.
|
||||
But you can also execute it by ":Unite snippet". The snippet
|
||||
source offers an edit action you can use to edit the snippet
|
||||
files.
|
||||
|
||||
Example:
|
||||
>
|
||||
imap <C-s> <Plug>(neosnippet_start_unite_snippet)
|
||||
<
|
||||
@ -608,26 +610,26 @@ snippet *neosnippet-unite-action-snippet*
|
||||
==============================================================================
|
||||
FAQ *neosnippet-faq*
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Don't expanded snippet trigger after (, [, " etc...:
|
||||
Q: What if I do not like to expand a snippet trigger after (, [, " etc...:
|
||||
|
||||
A: You should use "options word" in snippet definition. "options word" means
|
||||
this snippet is expanded by word boundary.
|
||||
A: You should use "options word" in the snippet definition. This changes the
|
||||
expansion behavior to a word boundary.
|
||||
>
|
||||
snippet date
|
||||
options word
|
||||
`strftime("%d %b %Y")`
|
||||
<
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Doesn't indent in expanded line:
|
||||
Q: Why does neosnippet not indent the expanded snippet?
|
||||
|
||||
A: You should use "options indent" in snippet definition. In default,
|
||||
neosnippet doesn't indent in expanded line.
|
||||
A: You should use "options indent" in the snippet definition. In default,
|
||||
neosnippet doesn't indent the expanded line.
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Neosnippet conflicts with |LustyJuggler|.
|
||||
Q: What if Neosnippet conflicts with |LustyJuggler|.
|
||||
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=2050
|
||||
|
||||
A: Please try below settings:
|
||||
Note: But you must unmap in select mode mappings manually.
|
||||
Note: But you must unmap the mappings in select mode manually.
|
||||
>
|
||||
let g:neosnippet#disable_select_mode_mappings = 0
|
||||
<
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user