x11-apps/compton::bruners and x11-apps picom::hasufell #66

Open
opened 2021-09-26 13:49:07 +00:00 by Archetypic · 6 comments
Collaborator

Hello, x11-apps/compton and x11-apps/picom are identical.

x11-apps/compton HOMEPAGE = https://github.com/yshui/picom

x11-apps/picom HOMEPAGE = https://github.com/yshui/picom

Is there anything that should be done about this?

I have contacted the owner of ::bruners regarding this situation.

Hello, `x11-apps/compton` and `x11-apps/picom` are identical. `x11-apps/compton` HOMEPAGE = https://github.com/yshui/picom `x11-apps/picom` HOMEPAGE = https://github.com/yshui/picom Is there anything that should be done about this? I have contacted the owner of `::bruners` regarding this situation.
Owner

No idea. The correct name is picom, not compton. Which exheres was the first?

No idea. The correct name is picom, not compton. Which exheres was the first?
Author
Collaborator

Compton orginated in 2013 and changed it's upstream fetch to picom in 2019.

Source: History

Compton orginated in 2013 and changed it's upstream fetch to `picom` in [2019](https://github.com/Bruners/exheres/commit/4e7f1e1cf83c5659470c222d323e9c1caeec886f#diff-fb526d216b764c85ae1197ccc2d2c251d4eee149c8956008105474eecb8a4fa5). Source: [History](https://github.com/Bruners/exheres/commits/master/packages/x11-apps/compton)
Owner

I'm aware. That wasn't my question. I asked which exheres came first.

I'm aware. That wasn't my question. I asked which **exheres** came first.
Owner

https://github.com/Bruners/exheres/commit/7c447cfe4a573149c30cdc58c62c45a8637fb76f.patch

https://gogs.hasufell.de/hasufell/hasufell-repository/commit/fefc82e8b698f6dbf16aa840a3cb0c8220fc7b8a.patch

So Bruners compton was implicitly (and badly) renamed to picom in 25 Apr 2020. My exheres is from 4 Jan 2020, so came first. That means I'll not remove it.

[https://github.com/Bruners/exheres/commit/7c447cfe4a573149c30cdc58c62c45a8637fb76f.patch](https://github.com/Bruners/exheres/commit/7c447cfe4a573149c30cdc58c62c45a8637fb76f.patch) [https://gogs.hasufell.de/hasufell/hasufell-repository/commit/fefc82e8b698f6dbf16aa840a3cb0c8220fc7b8a.patch](https://gogs.hasufell.de/hasufell/hasufell-repository/commit/fefc82e8b698f6dbf16aa840a3cb0c8220fc7b8a.patch) So Bruners compton was implicitly (and badly) renamed to picom in `25 Apr 2020`. My exheres is from `4 Jan 2020`, so came first. That means I'll not remove it.
Author
Collaborator

Bruner's compton switched to "picom" in Jun 23, 2019.

Source: 4e7f1e1cf8 (diff-fb526d216b764c85ae1197ccc2d2c251d4eee149c8956008105474eecb8a4fa5)

Quoting commit message: "Switch to maintained fork[1], upstream seems to be almost abandoned[2]."

Originally the maintained fork was called compton but renamed itself to picom. The exheres was never renamed to account for this. Link 1 references compton:https://github.com/yshui/compton though today it redirects to https://github.com/yshui/picom.

Bruner's compton switched to "picom" in `Jun 23, 2019`. Source: https://github.com/Bruners/exheres/commit/4e7f1e1cf83c5659470c222d323e9c1caeec886f#diff-fb526d216b764c85ae1197ccc2d2c251d4eee149c8956008105474eecb8a4fa5 Quoting commit message: "Switch to maintained fork[1], upstream seems to be almost abandoned[2]." Originally the maintained fork was called `compton` but renamed itself to picom. The exheres was never renamed to account for this. Link 1 references `compton`:https://github.com/yshui/compton though today it redirects to https://github.com/yshui/picom.
Owner

Yeah, not sure what to do. I think keeping it as compton package is wrong.

Yeah, not sure what to do. I think keeping it as `compton` package is wrong.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: hasufell/hasufell-repository#66
No description provided.