hasufell/ghcup-hs
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Update

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Julian Ospald 2021-07-29 22:45:48 +02:00
parent f12a2b3821
commit 32e34876e2
Signed by: hasufell
GPG Key ID: 3786C5262ECB4A3F
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
README.md
View File

@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ Oddly, this question has been asked a couple of times. For the curious, here are
2. Even if they did, it doesn't seem it would have satisfied their needs
- it didn't support cabal installation, which was the main motivation behind GHCup back then
- depending on a codebase as big as stack for a central part of one's application without having a short contribution pipeline would likely have caused stagnation or resulted in simply copy-pasting the relevant code in order to adjust it
- it's nor clear how GHCup would have been implemented with the provided API. It seems the codebases are fairly different. GHCup does a lot of symlink handling to expose a central `bin/` directory that users can easily put in PATH, without having to worry about anything more. It also provides explicit removal functionality, GHC cross-compilation, a TUI, etc etc.
- it's not clear how GHCup would have been implemented with the provided API. It seems the codebases are fairly different. GHCup does a lot of symlink handling to expose a central `bin/` directory that users can easily put in PATH, without having to worry about anything more. It also provides explicit removal functionality, GHC cross-compilation, a TUI, etc etc.
3. GHCup is built around unix principles and supposed to be simple.
### Why not unify...